|
Diversity in conceptualisation of having "had
sex".
|
|
|
|
|
| Article Type: | Brief article |
| Subject: |
Mediating effects (Research)
(Analysis) Sexual behavior surveys (Reports) |
| Pub Date: | 05/01/2010 |
| Publication: | Name: Reproductive Health Matters Publisher: Reproductive Health Matters Audience: General Format: Magazine/Journal Subject: Family and marriage; Health; Women's issues/gender studies Copyright: COPYRIGHT 2010 Reproductive Health Matters ISSN: 0968-8080 |
| Issue: | Date: May, 2010 Source Volume: 18 Source Issue: 35 |
| Topic: | Canadian Subject Form: Sexual behaviour surveys |
| Geographic: | Geographic Scope: United States Geographic Code: 1USA United States |
|
|
|
| Accession Number: | 236247756 |
| Full Text: |
Understanding the meaning of the word "sex" has
implications for medical research and clinical practice. This is the
first study of a representative sample to assess attitudes about which
sexual behaviours constitute having "had sex" and to examine
possible mediating factors. A telephone survey of randomly selected
English-speaking residents of Indiana, US, was conducted, giving a
sample of 204 men and 282 women aged 18-96. Questions assessed attitudes
on manual-genital, oral-genital, penile-vaginal intercourse and
penile-anal behaviours. There was no universal consensus on which
behaviours constituted having "had sex". 95% responded
"yes" to penile-vaginal intercourse, bur this dropped to 89%
if there is no ejaculation. 81% responded "yes" to penile-anal
intercourse, and 71% and 73% responded "yes" to oral-genital,
either performing or receiving, respectively. Manual-genital was
endorsed more often when received (48.1%) than given (44.9%, p<
0.001). Among men, the oldest and youngest age groups were significantly
less likely to believe certain behaviours constituted having "had
sex". It is necessary to use behaviour-specific terminology in
sexual history taking, sex research, sexual health promotion and sex
education. Researchers, educators and medical practitioners should not
assume that their own definitions of having "had sex" are
shared by research participants or patients. (1) (1.) Sanders SA, Hill BJ, Yarber WL, et al. Misclassification bias: diversity in conceptualisations about having 'had sex'. Sexual Health 2010;7(1):31-34. |
| Gale Copyright: | Copyright 2010 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. |
Previous Article: Induction to abortion interval in second trimester
medical abortion.
Next Article: What is happening to human fertility?
Next Article: What is happening to human fertility?