Cricoid pressure: a review of the literature.
Aspiration pneumonitis (Mendelson's syndrome) is universally
accepted as a complication of general anaesthesia. According to Ellis et
al (2007) death from aspiration was first described by Simpson in 1848,
and it was not until 1946 that Mendelson identified acid aspiration in a
significant number of obstetric patients undergoing facemask
anaesthesia. The advent of techniques to secure the airway, through the
use of airway adjuncts has gone some way to reduce the likely incidence
of aspiration in today's perioperative arena. The positive outcome
for patients is corroborated by Neilipovitz & Crosby (2007) who
report aspiration as a rare complication with an overall incidence of
1:2,000-3,000. As Ewart (2007) highlights, Mendelson's syndrome is
due to pharmacological effects at a molecular level which occur in the
airway tissues and are caused by the use of induction and neuromuscular
blocking agents. The resultant loss of consciousness and consequent
diminished protective airway reflexes ultimately places the patient at
risk until their airway is secured. Preventative measures to protect the
lung from contamination with gastric contents, for example preoperative
fasting, are therefore instigated prior to securing the airway.
KEYWORDS Cricoid pressure / Best practice / Pulmonary aspiration / Sellick's manoeuvre
Aspiration pneumonia (Care and treatment)
Aspiration pneumonia (Research)
Begley, Ann Marie
|Publication:||Name: Journal of Perioperative Practice Publisher: Association for Perioperative Practice Audience: Academic Format: Magazine/Journal Subject: Health; Health care industry Copyright: COPYRIGHT 2011 Association for Perioperative Practice ISSN: 1750-4589|
|Issue:||Date: July, 2011 Source Volume: 21 Source Issue: 7|
|Topic:||Event Code: 310 Science & research|
|Geographic:||Geographic Scope: Ireland Geographic Code: 4EUIR Ireland|
In emergency situations where the gastric content is unknown Palmer
et al (2000) and Levitan et al (2006) state that cricoid pressure (CP)
is an additional technique that can be employed to protect the lungs
from pulmonary aspiration during rapid sequence induction (RSI) and
tracheal intubation. CP temporarily occludes the upper end of the
oesophagus. It is performed on patients identified as high risk and is
intended to decrease the likelihood of pulmonary aspiration during
emergency anaesthetic induction (Landsman 2004). RSI is recognised by
the Difficult Airway Society (2007) as a common anaesthetic technique
employed in the UK if there is a risk of gastro-oesophageal reflux.
Although RSI is universally carried out in medical institutes, the effectiveness of CP is questioned due to the continued incidence of pulmonary aspiration despite application of CP (Beavers et al 2009). Brimacombe and Berry (1997) recognises that insufficient information is available regarding CP and that confirmation of the appropriate mode and the force necessary is required within the clinical environment.
It is vital to establish if the practice of applying CP is beneficial to the patient, or if it is a ritual carried out with no regard to the evidence available. The advantages and disadvantages should be identified, as well as the barriers preventing effective application of cricoid pressure. Patten (2006) implies that nurses routinely applying CP do not always do so correctly and that this results in sub optimum intubating conditions and ineffective pulmonary protection from aspiration.
This article details a comprehensive literature review that was carried out using a cross-search of online databases including CINAHL, British Nursing Index, MEDLINE, Biomedical Reference and Pubmed.
History of cricoid pressure
Cricoid pressure was originally described by Monro in 1774 as a manoeuvre to prevent air from entering the stomach by occluding the oesophagus during resuscitation of near-drowning victims (Patten 2006). In modern anaesthesia it was first proposed by Sellick in 1961 as a method for preventing regurgitation and aspiration of stomach contents during induction of and emergence from general anaesthesia (Sellick 1961).
Cricoid pressure, also referred to as Sellick's manoeuvre, is routinely used during induction of anaesthesia to prevent pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents in patients identified as being at high risk of aspiration (Neelakanta 2003, Landsman 2004, Walker et al 2010). The acidic gastric fluid is identified as causing lung damage resulting in loss of surfactant and the development of pneumonitis within hours of aspiration (Pescod 2005). This is supported by Aitkenhead et al (2007) who state that if aspiration occurs it can have clinical consequences leading to fulminating aspiration pneumonitis and acquired respiratory distress syndrome; this is recognised as the most common and most devastating of anaesthetic hazards. In contrast Prazeres (2010) and Neilipovitz and Crosby (2007) state that aspiration and its consequences are not common complications in modern anaesthetics procedures and the incidence is approximately between one and seven cases of significance in 10,000 anaesthetics.
Sellick (1961) states that a suitable external force needs to be appropriately conveyed through the cricoid ring arch resulting in occlusion of the oesophagus against the fifth cervical vertebrae body to achieve successful application of CP. Smith et al (2003) acknowledges that the cricoid cartilage is the only complete ring in the trachea and applying pressure at this point compresses and occludes the oesophagus at the C5 - C6 level. Landsman (2004) confirms this stating that mistakenly applying pressure on any other cartilaginous structures of the trachea can be ineffective and can lead to sub-optimal intubation situations. This is still considered best practice by Garrard et al (2004) and Turgeon et al (2005) who describe CP as the application of firm backward pressure on the cricoid cartilage by the first three fingers of the anaesthetic assistant against the sixth cervical vertebra resulting in a decrease of the oesophageal lumen.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
According to Clayton and Vanner (2002), Hein and Owen (2005) and Patten (2006), CP is a commonly practised technique in the prevention of pulmonary aspiration and is fundamental to RSI. Lerman (2009) supports this stating that CP is 'the quintessential cornerstone' of RSI. Walz et al (2007) recognise that the application of CP is established practice in the teaching of RSI. According to El-Orbany and Connolly (2010) 44 Newton's (N) was traditionally the recommended force but this has been revised and is now considered excessive. Hein and Owen (2005), The Difficult Airway Society (2007) and Parry (2009) argue that for CP to be protective it must provide an occlusion pressure excessive to oesophageal or gastric pressure, and they advocate a force of 20-30N to achieve this. This force is also recommended in a study by Cook et al (2000) who state that, even during emergency obstetric surgery, gastric pressure averages remain below 25mmHg. Although Beavers et al (2009) state that pressure from 20-30N is sufficient for effective CP, they recommend 44N as a reasonable force to protect the patient's airway.
Physiology related to gastric reflux and pulmonary aspiration
The three stages which result in pulmonary aspiration can be outlined as follows:
* reflux of stomach contents into the oesophagus
* regurgitation of these contents into the pharynx and finally
* pulmonary aspiration of the pharyngeal contents (Vanner 1993).
Ng and Smith (2001) state that the physiological mechanisms involved in preventing reflux and regurgitation are:
* the lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS)
* the upper oesophageal sphincter and
* the laryngeal reflexes.
Aitkenhead et al (2007) identifies regurgitation as a passive process and it is often described as 'silent', or occurring without the practitioner's knowledge. According to Vanner (1993) gastric reflux is due to an incompetent LOS and regurgitation occurs when the upper airway pressures fall below that of the oesophagus. This situation is likely to take place during induction of anaesthesia as the upper oesophageal sphincter is relaxed. The most important mechanism for protecting the airway from aspiration is the LOS which is normally closed and is located at the distal end of the oesophagus where it joins the top of the stomach (Peterson 2007). The closed LOS maintains a resting pressure (10 to 15mmHg) and prevents reflux of the stomach contents into the oesophagus (Peterson 2007). Aitkenhead et al (2007) state that many anaesthetic drugs affect the resting tone of the LOS therefore reducing its capacity to act as the main barrier in preventing reflux.
High risk patients
Certain pre-existing factors are common to increased risk of regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration. Usually these factors are related to a patient's condition which predisposes to delayed gastric emptying or regurgitation (Table 1). Lockey et al (1999) and Hein and Owen (2005) recognise that patients suffering severe trauma may have full stomachs and impaired airway reflexes, increasing their risk of pulmonary aspiration. Vanner (1993) points out that gastric reflux caused by an incompetent lower oesophageal sphincter is found in pregnant women and further states that, prior to cricoid pressure becoming a fundamental component of rapid sequence during tracheal intubation, the leading cause of maternal death was pulmonary aspiration (Vanner 2009).
Lockey et al (1999) declare that aspiration is also commonly associated with neurological trauma and a subsequent Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS - a record of
monitoring of the state of consciousness of a person) of 8 and below. Other factors associated with a higher incidence of aspiration include a history of hiatus hernia accompanied by reflux, obesity, gastric obstruction, difficult intubation, underlying neurological diseases, critical illnesses and extremes of age (Neilipovitz & Crosby 2007, Hein & Owen 2005, Prazeres 2010, Spoors & Kiff 2010).
Management of 'high risk' patients
Aitkenhead et al (2007) and Mellor (2004) state that if a risk of gastric aspiration is anticipated RSI should be performed as it facilitates expeditious intubation of the trachea leading to prompt protection of the airway. Ellis et al (2007) support this, maintaining that the main goal of RSI is to minimise gastric insufflation and to provide prompt endo-tracheal intubation conditions. El-Orbany and Connolly (2010) state that, although RSI is considered standard care for patients with full stomachs requiring induction of anaesthesia, no standard protocol has yet been established.
The process of RSI involves pre-oxygenation of the patient, administration of a fastacting induction agent followed by a rapidacting muscle relaxant, and application of CP at the time of administration until confirmation of the correct placement of endo-tracheal tube by the anaesthetist (Morrison & Cook 2001, Spoors & Kiff 2010). The Difficult Airway Society (2010) advocate the application of light pressure, no more than 10N, on the cricoid cartilage on induction of anaesthesia, increasing to 30N once loss of consciousness is achieved. Aitkenhead et al (2007) recommend that a skilled assistant performs CP but, as Patten (2006) suggests, this role is often carried out incorrectly.
Controversy surrounding cricoid pressure
Brimacombe and Berry (1997) argue that concerns have been expressed regarding the safety and efficacy of CP despite it appearing to be a simple and anatomically appropriate manoeuvre. They note that the application of CP is detrimental to patient safety, and that there are few studies which confirm the clinical benefits of cricoid pressure.
A study by Allman (1995) demonstrates that the use of CP, even by experienced anaesthetists, can cause a degree of airway obstruction and can even result in complete airway occlusion. More recently Hartsilver and Vanner (2000) suggest that CP possibly contributed to events of difficult ventilation and that the degree of airway obstruction correlated with the force applied to the cricoid cartilage. Smith et al (2003) conducted an observational study using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to determine the anatomical relationship between the oesophagus, the cricoid cartilage and the vertebral body. This study concluded that in over 50% of the subjects the anatomy was not aligned and the application of CP increased the frequency and degree of oesophageal and airway displacement, therefore reducing optimum laryngoscopy conditions.
Gobindrum and Clarke (2008) argue that this questions the concept described in Sellick's original paper (1961) where occlusion of the oesophageal lumen is demonstrated in X-ray images at the level of the 5th cervical vertebra body as a result of pressure being applied to the cricoid cartilage. Furthermore, a study by Garrad et al (2004) demonstrated that application of cricoid pressure resulted in a significant reduction in lower oesophageal pressure in 30 anesthetised volunteers, leading to a decline of oesophageal barrier pressure. Garrad et al (2004) further state that any manoeuvre which results in the reduction in barrier pressure potentially increases the risk of gastro-oesophageal reflux. Contrary to this, Neelakanta (2003) states that several studies demonstrate the effectiveness of CP in identified high risk patients. In fact, a study by Schwartz et al (1995) demonstrates that in 75% of oral intubations CP was applied, with only 4% resulting in an unexplained pulmonary infiltrate present on post intubation chest radiographs. A more recent study on the effectiveness of CP using MRI by Rice et al (2009) challenges Smith et al's (2003) findings and supports Sellick's (1961) original proposal that CP is effective in reducing pulmonary aspiration by occluding the oesophagus. This investigation illustrates that the hypopharynx and cricoid cartilage move together acting as an anatomical unit which is essential for the efficacy and reliability of CP.
Neilipovitz et al (2007) claim that no published randomised controlled trials comparing the outcome of patients with and without application of CP after RSI exist, though as Ellis et al (2007), Lerman (2009) and Vanner (2009) suggest that this is because such a trial would be unethical. According to Lerman (2009) guidelines in anaesthesia endorse CP and its omission legally represents poor practice (M. v East Hertfordshire Health Authority 1991).
Priebe (2005) maintains that CP is still considered an essential technique in RSI in many parts worldwide and that failure to provide CP for high risk patients may be considered negligent. It is appropriate in this context to reflect upon the phrase, 'primum non nocere' or 'first, do no harm' an expression attributed to Aristotle (Parry 2009) . This is a fundamental principle of healthcare ethics: do good and do no harm. In line with this, anaesthetic assistants, who are very often nurses, must ensure that their practice is up to date in order to provide clients with high standard safe and effective evidence based care, in accordance with the Nursing and Midwifery Council's code of conduct (NMC 2008).
Future of cricoid pressure
According to El-Orbany and Connolly (2010) the use of cricoid pressure during rapid sequence induction continues to be contentious. Some believe in its efficacy in preventing pulmonary aspiration, whereas others believe it should be discarded due to the potential complications and lack of scientific evidence of its benefit. A study by Cook et al (2000) found that 11% of anaesthetic assistants had experienced regurgitation despite application of CP, and these authors maintain that the risk of aspiration is in fact increased through the application of CP (El-Orbany & Connolly 2010) . Fenton and Reynolds (2009) argue that its efficacy in saving lives is difficult to
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
establish. Their study observing cricoid pressure and maternal outcome in Malawi supports the practice of preoperative emptying of the stomach instead of the practice of CP application.
Hein and Owen (2005) state that CP is a technical procedure which requires constructive education, continual practice and the monitoring of competencies. In a study by Clark and Trethewy (2005) assessing the application of CP, 75% of the participants applied incorrect force, which often resulted in inadequate protection against regurgitation. Both authors recommended training using a model which integrates the concept of force. This is supported by Allman and Wilson (2007) who claim that CP is a skilled and practised technique. Allman (1995) states that correct application of force on the cricoid cartilage is essential; a lower force may result in insufficient oesophageal occlusion whereas excessive force can compress the airway and impair laryngeal visualisation.
In a large study by Meek et al (1999) regarding the standards of practice of practitioners applying CP, it was found that their knowledge was poor and that only one third of the study subjects knew the appropriate pressure to apply. In more recent studies by Stanton (2006) and Nafiu et al (2009) the evidence continues to indicate that anaesthetic assistants often do not possess the knowledge or skills required to correctly identify the cricoid cartilage and apply CP accurately. As recognised by Patten (2006), registered nurses in the operating department frequently perform the cricoid pressure during RSI but they may not possess adequate skills or knowledge to do so competently. This suggestion is further supported in a study by Beavers et al (2009) which reveals significant deficiencies in the knowledge and application of CP amongst anaesthetic assistants. In a pre-test - post-test study by Patten (2006), which looked at the influence of an education programme on cricoid pressure application, a significant post-test improvement was evident.
It is vital that the practitioner must ensure that unnecessary harm to the patient is avoided. The NMC code of conduct (NMC 2008) states that a professional nurse must have the knowledge and skills for safe, effective practice; participating in relevant learning and practice activities to ensure optimum competence and performance in the clinical area. If the concept of nonmaleficence is to be upheld and optimal care offered, it is vital that the practitioner makes certain that his or her knowledge and skills are current and practised, therefore maintaining best standards in practice.
Butler (2005) recognises that, even though CP is widely accepted as standard practice during emergency RSI of anaesthesia in the UK, the USA and many other parts of the world, there are no studies that confirm the alleged clinical benefit of CP in reducing the incidence of pulmonary aspiration in high risk patients. Letters to medical journals indicate that the debate on cricoid pressure continues.
'As a profession we invest a great deal of importance in a technique that is inadequately researched, poorly taught and badly performed' (Haslam & Duggan 2004).
Within the literature there appears to be a lack of consensus concerning the safety and value of CP, although all authors do agree on one point: the knowledge and skills demonstrated by personnel responsible for applying CP in the clinical area are lacking. Parry (2009) recognises from the literature that inconsistencies exist in the knowledge and practice of CP, as well as conflicting opinions on the optimal force required to ensure safe and effective occlusion of the oesophagus. The author concludes that education is essential in ensuring best practice. Matthews (2001) suggests that a structured approach to the training of CP would benefit all staff, particularly those carrying out this role infrequently in the clinical area. It is vital that evidence based practice is demonstrated appropriately throughout the management of RSI and that the application of CP is not performed as a traditional ritual with insufficient consideration given to the rationale behind it (Ewart 2007). All nurses working within the anaesthetic arena have a duty of care to demonstrate the ability to perform effective cricoid pressure, and to equip themselves with a working knowledge of the subject if patient safety is to be maintained and the principle of 'primum non nocere' is to be upheld (Parry 2009).
Provenance and Peer review: Unsolicited contribution; Peer reviewed; Accepted for publication April 2011.
Aitkenhead AR, Smith G, Rowbotham DJ 2007 Textbook of Anaesthesia 5th edition London, Churchill Livingstone
Allman KG 1995 The effect of cricoids pressure application on airway patency Journal of Anesthesia 7 197-199
Allman KG, Wilson IH 2007 Oxford Handbook of Anaesthesia 2nd edition Oxford, Oxford University Press
Beavers RA, Moos DD, Cuddeford JD 2009 Analysis of the application of cricoid pressure: implications for the clinician Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing 24 (2) 92-102
Brimacombe JR, Berry AM 1997 Cricoid pressure Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 44 (4) 414-425
Butler J 2005 Cricoid pressure in emergency rapid sequence induction Emergency Medicine Journal 22 813-816
Clark RK, Trethewy CE 2005 Assessment of cricoid pressure application by emergency department staff Emergency Medicine Australasia 17 (4) 376-381
Clayton TJ, Vanner RG 2002 A novel method of measuring cricoid force Anaesthesia 57 326-329
Cook TM, Godfrey I, Rockett M Vanner RG 2000 Cricoid pressure: which hand? Anaesthesia 55 648-653
Difficult Airway Society 2007 Rapid sequence induction - guidelines Available from: www.das.uk.com/guidelines/rsi.html [Accessed May 2011]
Ellis DY, Harris T, Zideman D 2007 Cricoid pressure in emergency department rapid sequence tracheal intubations: a risk-benefit analysis Annals of Emergency Medicine 50 (6) 653-665
El-Orbany M, Connolly LA 2010 Rapid sequence induction and intubation: current controversy Anesthesia & Analgesia 110 (5) 1318-1325
Ewart L 2007 The efficacy of cricoid pressure Journal of Perioperative Practice 17 (9) 432-436
Fenton PM, Reynolds F 2009 Life-saving or ineffective? An observational study of the use of cricoid pressure and maternal outcome in an African setting International Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia 18 106-110
Garrard A, Campbell AE, Turley A, Hall JE 2004 The effect of mechanically-induced cricoid pressure on lower oesophageal sphincter pressure in anaesthetised patients Anaesthesia 59 435-439
Gobindrum A, Clarke S 2008 Cricoid pressure: should we lay off the pressure Anaesthesia 63 1255-1256
Hartsilver EL, Vanner RG 2000 Airway obstruction with cricoid pressure Anaesthesia 55 208-211
Haslam N, Duggan JE 2004 Cricoid pressure Anaesthesia 59 88-99
Hein C, Owen H 2005 The effective application of cricoid pressure Journal of Emergency Primary Health Care 3 (1-2 Available from: http://www.jephc.com/full_article.cfm?content_id=193 [Accessed May 2011]
Landsman I 2004 Cricoid pressure indications and complications Pediatric Anesthesia 14 43-47
Lerman J 2009 On cricoid pressure: 'May the force be with you' Anesthesiology & Analgesia 109 (5) 1363-1366
Levitan RM, Kinkle WC, Levin WJ, Everett WW 2006 Laryngeal view during laryngoscopy: a randomized trial comparing cricoid pressure, backward-upwardrightward pressure, and bimanual laryngoscopy Annals of Emergency Medicine 47 (6) 548-555
Lockey DJ, Coats T, Parr MJA 1999 Aspiration in severe trauma: a prospective study Anaesthesia 54 (1) 1097-1099
M. v East Hertfordshire Health Authority 1991 Clinical negligence cases: Anaesthesia claim Available from: www.ffw.com/feature/clinicalnegligence-cases---an.aspx [Accessed May 2011]
Matthews GA 2001 Survey of cricoid pressure application by anaesthetists, operating department practitioners, intensive care and accident and emergency nurses Anaesthesia 56 915-917
Meek T, Gittins N, Duggan JE 1999 Cricoid pressure: knowledge and performance amongst anaesthetic assistants Anaesthesia 54 (1) 59-62
Mellor J 2004 Induction of anaesthesia in paediatric patients Update in Anaesthesia 18 (8) Available from: www.nda.ox.ac.uk/wfsa/html/u18/u1808_01.htm#rapi [Accessed May 2011]
Morrison J, Cook TM 2001 Rapid sequence induction: a national survey of practice Anaesthesia 56 (11) 1090-1115
Nafiu OO, Bradin S, Tremper, KK, Arbor A 2009 Knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding cricoid pressure of ED personnel at a large US teaching hospital Journal of Emergency Nursing 35 (1) 11-15
Neelakanta G 2003 Cricoid pressure is effective in preventing esophageal regurgitation Anesthesiology 99 242
Neilipovitz DT, Crosby ET 2007 No evidence for decreased incidence of aspiration after rapid sequence induction Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 54 (9) 748-764
Ng A, Smith G 2001 Gastroesophageal reflux and aspiration of gastric contents in anaesthetic practice Anesthesia & Analgesia 93 494-513
Nursing and Midwifery Council 2008 The Code: Standards of conduct, performance and ethics for nurses and midwives Available from: www.nmc-uk.org/Nurses-and-midwives/Thecode/The-code-in-full/ [Accessed May 2011]
Palmer JH, Mac G, Bell DR 2000 The effect of cricoid pressure on the cricoid cartilage and vocal cords: an endoscopic study in anaesthetised patients Anaesthesia 55 263-268
Parry A 2009 Teaching anaesthetic nurses optimal force for effective cricoid pressure: a literature review Nursing Critical Care 14 (3) 139-144
Patten SP 2006 Educating nurses about correct application of cricoid pressure APRN Journal 84 (3) 449-461.
Pescod D 2005 Rapid sequence induction Developing Anaesthesia.org Available from: www.developinganaesthesia.org/index.php?option=co m_content&task=view&id=42&rtemid=45 [Accessed May 2011]
Peterson OH 2007 Lecture Notes Human Physiology 5th Edition Massachusetts, Blackwell Publishing
Prazeres GDA 2010 Pulmonary aspiration Anesthesiology Available from: www.medstudents.com.br/anest/anest2.htm [Accessed May 2011]
Priebe HJ 2005 Cricoid pressure: an evidence-based practice? Middle East Journal of Anaesthesiology 18 (3) 485-492
Rice MJ, Mancuso AA, Gibbs C, Morey TE, Gravenstein N, Deitte LA 2009 Cricoid pressure results in compression of the postcricoid hypopharynx: the esophageal position is irrelevant Anesthesia & Analgesia 109 (5) 1546-1552
Schwartz DE, Matthay MA, Cohen NH 1995 Death and other complications of emergency airway management in critically ill adults: a prospective investigation of 297 tracheal intubations Anaesthesiology 82 (2) 367-376
Sellick BA 1961 Cricoid pressure to control regurgitation of stomach contents during induction of anaesthesia Lancet ii 404-406
Smith KJ, Dobranowski J, Yip G Dauphin A, Choi PT-L 2003 Cricoid pressure displaces the esophagus: an observational study using magnetic resonance imaging Anaesthesiology 99 60-64
Spoors C, Kiff K 2010 Induction in special circumstances Training in Anaesthesia Oxford, Oxford University Press
Stanton J 2006 Literature review of safe use of cricoid pressure Journal of Perioperative Practice 16 (5) 250-257
Turgeon AF, Nicole PC, Trepanier CA, Marcoux S, Lessard MR 2005 Cricoid pressure does not increase the rate of failed intubation by direct laryngoscopy in adults Anaesthesiology 102 315319
Vanner R 1993 Mechanisms of regurgitation and its prevention with cricoid pressure International Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia 2 (4)
Vanner R 2009 Cricoid pressure International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 18 103-105
Walker RMW, Ravi R, Haylett K 2010 Effect of cricoid force on airway calibre in children: a bronchoscopic assessment British Journal of Anaesthesia 104 (1) 71-74
Walz JS, Zayaruzny M, Heard SO 2007 Airway management in critical illness Chest 131 608-620
Correspondence address: Norah Holmes, Anaesthetic Nurse, Royal Hospitals, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BA, Northern Ireland.
About the authors
Norah Holmes RN, BSc Hons
Anaesthetic Nurse, Royal Hospitals, Belfast
Daphne Martin RN, RNT, MSc
Nurse Lecturer/Pathway Leader Specialist Practice in Anaesthetic Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University, Belfast
Ann Marie Begley RN, RNT, PhD
Lecturer, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Queen's University, Belfast
No competing interests declared
Table 1 Patients at high risk of pulmonary aspiration during anaesthesia Severe trauma Pregnant women Glasgow Coma Scale < 8 History of hiatus hernia accompanied by reflux Critical illnesses and extremes of age Extremes of age Obesity Gastric obstruction Difficult intubation Underlying neurological diseases
|Gale Copyright:||Copyright 2011 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.|