Chandipura virus--what we know & do not know.
Article Type: Disease/Disorder overview
Subject: Rhabdoviruses (Research)
Author: John, T. Jacob
Pub Date: 08/01/2010
Publication: Name: Indian Journal of Medical Research Publisher: Indian Council of Medical Research Audience: Academic Format: Magazine/Journal Subject: Biological sciences; Health Copyright: COPYRIGHT 2010 Indian Council of Medical Research ISSN: 0971-5916
Issue: Date: August, 2010 Source Volume: 132 Source Issue: 2
Topic: Event Code: 310 Science & research
Geographic: Geographic Scope: India Geographic Code: 9INDI India
Accession Number: 237135669
Full Text: The Chandipura virus was discovered in 1966 by Bhatt and Rodrigues, scientists of the Virus Research Centre (VRC) established by the Rockefeller Foundation in 1952 in Poona (now Pune) (1). They were investigating persons with fever in Chandipura in northern Maharashtra, near Nagpur, for dengue or chikungunya virus aetiology (1). The virus thus detected was hitherto unknown, and Bhatt and Rodrigues named it Chandipura after the geographic location of its discovery (1).

In 1967 VRC was handed over to the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) which renamed it as the National Institute of Virology (NIV). The main focus of VRC was to identify and document all Indian 'arboviruses' (arthropod-borne viruses--viruses of different families and genera that are transmitted by blood-sucking arthropod vectors--insects and ticks).

Not much importance was given to Chandipura virus by virologists for a number of years. Scientists of VRC/NIV had isolated it on various occasions from humans with short fever, hedgehog, sandflies (Phlebotomus spp.) and Aedes egypti mosquitoes. The virus is presumed to have wide geographic presence in India, as evidenced by the detection of virus-specific antibodies in humans and various animals in different parts of India. Much of these data had remained unpublished since the virus had no particular importance for human disease. In 1983, Rodrigues et al (2) reported the isolation of Chandipura virus from the blood of an 11 yr old child who died with acute encephalopathy syndrome. In 1988, a 35 yr old man had uneventful mediastinal surgery in our hospital in Vellore for a benign lesion; a week later he developed fever and intense headache and neck-stiffness; cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination showed lymphocytosis. The diagnosis was aseptic meningitis. In CSF we found a rapidly growing cytopathogenic virus in Vero cell culture (unpublished). The virus was enveloped--as shown by loss of infectivity when treated with a lipid solvent; thus it was not an enterovirus, the most common cause of viral meningitis. Unable to identify it, we sent it to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in the USA. Scientists in CDC were baffled at first as electron microscopy showed what looked like rabies virus. The patient had fully recovered in a week; his second CSF sample had no virus but had virus-neutralizing antibody. With this information, CDC scientists explored further and classified it as a member of Rhabdoviridae family and finally identified it as Chandipura virus (Pallansch M, personal communication). We surmised that the patient got infected while in the hospital, most probably by mosquito-bite, most likely Aedes aegypti. NIV scientists had earlier proved the vectorial capacity of mosquitoes to transmit Chandipura virus (3).

Chandipura virus came to the limelight in 2003, with the publication of a report by NIV scientists on a large outbreak of an acute neurological illness of young children with high case-fatality, diagnosed as encephalitis and putatively associated with infection with the virus (4). There were 329 cases with 183 fatalities (4). A subset of hospitalized children was investigated and plausible evidence for Chandipura virus aetiology was reasoned out (4). A retrospective analysis of another set of 104 children hospitalized in Hyderabad showed that the clinical features were those of encephalopathy (without leucocytosis in CSF) rather than encephalitis (5). The illness was characterized by acute onset fever, altered sensorium, seizures, diarrhoea and vomiting. Death or recovery occurred rapidly, within 2-3 days; there was no sequel in survivors. Most of those who died did so within 24 h of onset of illness (5). These findings led to the clinical diagnosis of 'brainstem encephalitis' partly to explain the lack of increase of cells in the CSF; the aetiology was described as Chandipura virus (5).

Another outbreak of 'acute encephalitis', again investigated by NIV scientists and diagnosed with Chandipura virus infection, was reported in eastern districts of Gujarat in 2003, mostly among tribal children (6). There were 26 cases and 18 fatalities (6). These reports have re-kindled scientific interest in Chandipura virus, believed to cause large scale outbreaks and death of hundreds of children. Several new studies have been reported (7-12), including one by Jadi and colleagues in this issue of the journal (13). The latter paper describes the growth kinetics of Chandipura virus in several cell lines and embryonated hen's eggs (13). Cells of mammalian origin (Vero and RD cells) and of insect origin (Ae. egypti and Phlebotomus papattasi cell lines) were susceptible to virus replication (13). The original virus discovery was made in infant mice used for specimen inoculation (1). NIV scientists have shown that Chandipura virus inoculated in the brain causes fatal encephalitis in mice (4). Chick embryo also is susceptible to infection (9,13). These observations confirm the presence of virus receptors in a very wide range of host species, invertebrate and vertebrate. From evolutionary viewpoint it is a very ancient virus.

Chandipura virus is classified under Rhabdoviridae family, genus Vesiculovirus. Members of this genus include Lyssa (rabies and bat Lyssa viruses), vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV, the cause of vesicular stomatitis of cattle) and many 'minor' viruses such as Isfahan and Chandipura. They tend to have distinct geographic prevalence--for example ,VSV belongs to the American continents. Bat Lyssa viruses are predominantly American and Australian, while Isfahan and Chandipura are Asian viruses. Isfahan virus is found in sand flies in Iran; Chandipura virus infects sand flies, mosquitoes and mammals including humans, in India and Sri Lanka (14). Earlier believed to be exclusively Asian, Chandipura virus has been reported in western Africa (in sand flies) (15,16). The importance of transcutaneouly transmitted Lyssa viruses to human and canine disease and death and that of VSV to epizootics in cattle are well known. VSV and Chandipura are transmitted by arthropods. Until the NIV reports on Chandipura virus causing 'encephalitis' epidemics with high case fatality, it was believed to be an inconsequential agent causing at best no illness or at worst short-lived febrile illness, with very rare instances of viral meningitis and possibly acute encephalopathy.

Some experts have raised doubts about the validity of evidences for Chandipura virus aetiology of epidemic encephalopathy (17-21). An arbovirus expert in CDC has stated: "Chandipura virus, an infrequently recognized rhabdovirus, was attributed to large outbreaks of viral encephalitis; however, compelling evidence suggests that the relationship of illness and the virus are questionable" (17). The 2003 acute brain disease epidemic of Andhra Pradesh (4) was investigated independently by pediatric neurologists (18). The detailed neurological findings were interpreted to show that the outbreak was not one of 'encephalitis', but of an acute catastrophic event in the brain (18). The site of lesion was pinpointed to the brain supply territory of the middle cerebral artery. The nature of the arterial pathology was not investigated, but it was suggested to be spasm or transient obstruction due to vasculitis, rather than thrombo-embolism (18). That 'acute brain attack' could occur in an outbreak was new information (18,19). There was no clinical evidence of invasion by any pathogen, or of inflammatory lesions in pathology (4,18). If Chandipura virus aetiology is correct, the disease is mediated by vasculitis, not encephalitis (18,19).

Yet another study of acute encephalitis in Andhra Pradesh has provided intriguing results (20). In a hospital in Hyderabad all cases of encephalitis in children from May 2005 to April 2006 were prospectively investigated (20). Of the 90 cases, 25 yielded evidence of Chandipura virus infection by PCR, IgM antibody or seroconversion; however, no virus could be isolated (20). Among contacts of cases who were <15 yr of age, 71-73 per cent and among those who were >15 yr, 94-97 per cent had antibody evidence of past Chandipura virus infection (20). Thus Chandipura virus infection seems to nearly saturate the population by about 15 yr of age. Yet, reported outbreaks of acute brain disease supposedly caused by it have been inexplicably very few. However, basic studies on Chandipura virus must continue and as much details of its biology learned since it is a common agent of infection in a variety of species of hosts in India. Moreover, it is a vesiculovirus and much can be learned about the host-virus interactions of the genus, to which belongs rabies virus also.

Warangal district in Andhra Pradesh had, 2 years earlier, a very similar outbreak of acute encephalopathy which was investigated by NIV scientists who reported the isolation of measles virus directly from CSF of a few children, confirming measles virus aetiology (21). Earlier an epidemic acute encephalopathy syndrome was reported in Haryana, with measles virus directly isolated from the CSF of several children (22). Could very similar, if not identical, clinical disease affecting the brain and causing high case-fatality be caused by two very common viruses, measles and Chandipura? Genetic studies had not revealed major mutations in Chandipura virus to account for recent acquisition of virulence (10).

In short, it is possible that the true aetiology was neither measles nor Chandipura virus in these outbreaks. Investigations to discover the true aetiology in future outbreaks should not be confined to confirming or excluding infection with Chandipura and measles virus. The temptation to quickly seek to identify the causative agent in outbreaks of unknown diagnosis/ aetiology has misled many in the past. Instead every such outbreak should be thoroughly investigated using tools of epidemiology first, or at least in parallel with, investigating for aetiology. Often detailed epidemiology will lead to the correct aetiology.

The final word on the question whether Chandipura virus can cause outbreaks of encephalitis, encephalopathy or acute brain attack, will have to wait until they are confirmed in fresh epidemics by independent investigators. In science, truth is what is verifiable and verified for consistency and reliability.

T. Jacob John

(Formerly Professor & Head

Departments of Clinical Virology & Microbiology

Christian Medical College, Vellore)

439 Civil Supplies Godown Lane

Kamalakshipuram

Vellore, TN, 632 002, India

tjacobjohn@yahoo.co.in

References

(1.) Bhatt PN, Rodrigues FM. Chandipura: a new arbovirus isolated in India from patients with febrile illness. Indian J Med Res 1967; 55: 1295-305.

(2.) Rodrigues JJ, Singh PB, Dave DS, Prasan R, Ayachit V, Pavri KM. Isolation of Chandipura virus from the blood in acute encephalopathy syndrome. Indian J Med Res 1983; 77: 303-7.

(3.) Rao TR, Singh KRP, Dhanda V, Bhatt PN. Experimental transmission of Chandipura virus by mosquitoes. Indian J Med Res 1967; 55: 1306-10.

(4.) Rao BL, Basu A, Wairagkar NS, Gore MM, Arankalle VA, Thakare JP, et al. A large outbreak of acute encephalitis with high fatlity rate in children in Andhra Pradesh, India, Lancet 2004; 364: 869-74.

(5.) Rao NS, Wairagkar NS, Mohan MV, Khetan M, Somavathi S. Brain stem encephalitis associated with Chandipura virus in Andhra Pradesh outbreak. J Trop Pediatr 2008; 54: 25-30.

(6.) Chadha MS, Arankalle VA, Jadi RS, Joshi MV, Thakar JP, Madadev PV, et al. An outbreak of Chandipura virus encephalitis in the eastern districts of Gujarat state, India. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2005; 73: 566-70.

(7.) Geevarghese G, Arankalle VA, Jadi R, Kanojia PC, Joshi MV, Mishra AC. Detection of Chandipura virus from sand flies in the genus Sergentomyia (Diptera: Phlebotomoidae) at Karimnagar district, Andhra Pradesh, Indian. J Med Entemol 2005; 42: 495-6.

(8.) Joshi MV, Patel DR, Umarani VB, Ayachit VM, Geevarghese G, Mishra AC. Incidence of neutralizing antibodies to Chandipura virus in domestic animals in Karimnagar and Warangal districts of Andhra Pradesh, India. Acta Virol 2005; 49: 69-71.

(9.) Pawar SD, Singh A, Gangodkar SV, Rao BL. Propagation of Chandipura virus in chick embryos. Indian J Exp Biol 2005; 43: 930-2.

(10.) Arankalle VA, Prabhakar SS, Madhukar WA, Hanumaih, Dattatrya PS, Chandra MA. G, N, and P gene-based analysis of Chandipura viruses, India. Emerg Infect Dis 2005; 11: 123-6.

(11.) Kumar S, Jadi RS, Anakkathil SB, Tandale VB, Mishra AC, Arankalle VA. Development and evaluation of a real-time one step reverse-transcriptase PCR for quantitation of Chandipura virus. BMC Infect Dis 2008; 8: 168.

(12.) Tandale BV, Tikute SS, Arankalle VA, Sathe PS, Joshi MV, Ranadive SN, et al. Chandipura virus: a major cause of acute encephalitis in children in North Telengana, Andhra Pradesh, India. J Med Virol 2008; 80: 118-24.

(13.) Jadi RS, Sudeep AB, Kumar S, Arankalle VA, Mishra AC. Chandipura virus growth kinetics in vertebrate cell lines, insect cells lines & embryonated eggs. Indian J Med Res 2010; 132: 155-9.

(14.) Peiris JS, Dittus WP, Ratnayake CB. Seroepidemiology of dengue and other arboviruses in a natural population of toque macaques (Macaca sinica) at Polonnaruwa, Sri Lanka. J Med Primatol 1993; 22: 240-5.

(15.) Fontenille D, Traore-Lamizana M, Trouillet J, Leclerc A, Mondo M, Ba Y, et al. First isolation of arboviruses from phlebotomine sandflies in West Africa. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1994; 50: 570-4.

(16.) Traore-Lamizana M, Fontenille D, Diallo M, Ba Y, Mondo M, Adam F, et al. Arbovirus surveillance from 1990 to 1995 in the Barkedji area (Ferlo) of Senegal, a possible natural focus of Rift Valley fever virus. J Med Entomol 2001; 38: 480-92.

(17.) Sejvar JJ. The evolving epidemiology of viral encephalitis. Curr Opin Neurol 2006; 19: 350-7.

(18.) Rao PN, Kumar PA, Rao TA, Prasad YA, Rao CJ, Rajyam PL, et al. Role of Chandipura virus in an "epidemic brain attack" in Andhra Pradesh, India. J Pediatr Neurol 2004; 2: 131-43.

(19.) Ismail HIHM. Viruses and "epidemic brain attack". New agents, new challenges. J Pediatr Neurol 2004; 2: 117-9.

(20.) Tandale BV, Tikute SS, Arankalle VA, Sathe PS, Joshi MV, Ranadive SN, et al. Chandipura virus: a major cause of acute encephalitis in children in North Telengana, Andhra Pradesh, India. J Med Virol 2008; 80: 118-24.

(21.) Shaikh NJ, Wairagkar NS, Reddy SV, Thakare JP, Gadkari DA. Acute encephalitis without rash in Warangal, Andhra Pradesh and Vadodara, Gujarat, associated with measles virus. J Assoc Physicians India 2002; 50: 1198.

(22.) Wairagkar NS, Shaik NJ, Ratho RK, Ghosh D, Mahajan RC, Singhi S. Isolation of measles virus from cerebrospinal fluid of children with acute encephalopathy without rash. Indian Pediatr 2002; 38: 589-95.
Gale Copyright: Copyright 2010 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.