Antimicrobial drug-resistant Escherichia coli in wild birds and free-range poultry, Bangladesh.
Drug resistance in microorganisms
|Publication:||Name: Emerging Infectious Diseases Publisher: U.S. National Center for Infectious Diseases Audience: Academic; Professional Format: Magazine/Journal Subject: Health Copyright: COPYRIGHT 2012 U.S. National Center for Infectious Diseases ISSN: 1080-6040|
|Issue:||Date: Dec, 2012 Source Volume: 18 Source Issue: 12|
|Product:||SIC Code: 2015 Poultry slaughtering and processing|
Dissemination of Enterobacteriaceae that produce extended-spectrum
p-lactamases (ESBLs) is increasing in humans and animals globally (1,2).
Clinically relevant sequence and ESBL types have been reported among
wild birds (3). Escherichia coli strains from domestic animals and
poultry tend to carry the same CTX-M enzyme variants that are locally
dominant in human isolates (4). Using birds as sentinels of the spread
of antimicrobial drug resistance in the environment could indicate a
wider prevalence of drug-resistant disease in humans (3,5).
In Bangladesh, the problem of antimicrobial drug resistance in humans and poultry is augmented by the uncontrolled use of unprescribed antimicrobial drugs (6). A high prevalence of resistant phenotypes has recently been reported in poultry and human E. coli isolates from Bangladesh (6,7). ESBL-producing E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae are common in clinical settings (8), but data quantifying the prevalence of different ESBL genotypes are limited. We screened fecal samples from wild birds and from poultry in the Rajshahi district of Bangladesh for antimicrobial-resistant and ESBL-producing E. coli.
Samples from 96 birds (41 wild ducks, 29 chickens, 23 ducks, and 3 geese) were collected from the Padmachar area of Rajshahi District during January 2009. In this area, a lake hosts several thousand wintering wild birds; that lake also is frequented by poultry from surrounding households. Each fecal sample, collected by swirling a cotton swab in a bird's cloaca or droppings, was submerged in a bacterial freeze medium and handled as described (5). Each sample was placed on an Uriselect 4 agar plate (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Marnes-La-Coquette, France), and assessed for E. coli by biochemical testing and API 20E biochemical strips (bioMerieux SA, Marcy-l'Etoile, France). One E. coli isolate per positive bird sample was tested by disk diffusion against 15 antimicrobial drugs (Table 1) according to the recommendations of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (www.eucast.org). Multidrug resistance was defined as resistance to at least 3 classes of antimicrobial drugs.
Each sample was also enriched in brain-heart infusion broth (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) supplemented with vancomycin 16 [micro]g/mL (ICN Biomedicals Inc. Aurora, OH, USA) for 18 h at 37[degrees]C. For detection of ESBL-producing bacteria and genes ([bla.sub.CTX-M], [bla.sub.SHV], and [bla.sub.TEM]) in putative ESBL isolates, described methods were used (5,9). Carbapenem-resistant isolates were screened on Mueller-Hinton agar plates supplemented with 2 [micro]g/mL or 8 [micro]g/mL meropenem and incubated overnight at 37[degrees]C.
The genetic profiles of the ESBL-producing E. coli isolates were determined by using repetitive element PCR. The reaction mixture contained 1x Taq PCR buffer, 0.625 L mol/L primer ERIC1R (5 '-ATGTAAGCTCCTGGGGATTCAC-3'), 1.9 mmol/L Mg[Cl.sub.2] , 50 [micro]mol/L dNTPs, 0.6 U Taq polymerase, and template in a total volume of 20 [micro]L. Cycling parameters were 1 min at 94[degrees]C; 1 min at 36[degrees]C and 2 min at 72[degrees]C for 45 cycles, and a final extension for 5 min at at 72[degrees]C. Isolates that had identical strong band patterns but an addition or a loss of a weak band were assigned subtype numbers.
One representative for each repetitive element PCR genotype and subtype (n= 18) was characterized by multilocus sequence typing (MLST) (10). After sequencing, allele profiles and sequence types were determined by using the E. coli MLST database (http://mlst.ucc.ie/mlst/ dbs/Ecoli/#). One representative sample for each genotype was tested for transferability of the ESBL plasmid by conjugation to recipient E. coli DA11782 (mcrA, [DELTA]mrr-hsdRMS-mcrBC, [DELTA]lacX74, deoR, recA1, araD139[DELTA] [araleu] 7697, galK, rpsL, endA1, nupG, rifR). Equal amounts of donor and recipient overnight cultures in Luria-Bertani broth were mixed and incubated, without shaking, overnight at 37[degrees]C. Approximately [10.sup.9] CFU of conjugation mixture was placed on selective plates containing 10 L g/mL cefotaxime, 100 [micro]g/mL rifampin, and 50 [micro]g/mL nalidixic acid and incubated overnight at 37[degrees]C.
E. coli was isolated from 66 samples, yielding an isolation rate of 73.3% regardless of bird species. Thirty-five (53%) of the 66 isolates were resistant to -1 antimicrobial compounds. The most common resistance was to tetracycline. The 3 next most common resistances were to ampicillin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and nalidixic acid (Table 1). Multidrug resistance was found in 22.7% (15/66) of the isolates, and 13.6% (9/66) of the isolates were resistant to 4 or 5 classes of antimicrobial drugs. Screening for carbapenamase producers yielded no isolates.
The overall prevalence of ESBL carriage among birds was 30% (27/90); 36 E. coli isolates produced ESBL.
Thirty-four of them belonged to the CTX-M-1 group (2 [bla.sub.CTX-M-1] and 32 [bla.sub.CTX-M-15]) and 2 to the CTX-M-9 group, the latter of which were CTX-M-14-like. Combinations of [bla.sub.CTX-M-15] or [bla.sub.CTX-M-1] and [bla.sub.TEM-1] were detected in 50% of the isolates, whereas none harbored SHV-genes.
The genetic fingerprints of the ESBL-producing E. coli isolates identified 15 genotypes, of which 19 (53%) of 36 were type A (Table 2).This genotype was found in wild and domestic birds. MLST analysis revealed 15 different sequence types (STs) and 1 nontypeable isolate (Table 2). Four isolates had new allele types or a new combination of allele types and were given novel STs (ST2690-ST2693). STs found in wild birds differed from those in poultry. One CTX-M-14-producing isolate from chicken belonged to the internationally recognized ST131 clone. Conjugation was successful for 9/18 isolates, indicating the transferability of plasmids carrying ESBL genes.
The carriage rate of ESBLs was high and the predominating antimicrobial-resistant phenotypes of wild birds and poultry appeared to correlate with antimicrobial prescription patterns in Bangladesh (6). Most ESBL-positive samples originated from poultry, and household poultry was the predominant carrier of the [bla.sub.CTX-M-15] genotype and the CTX-M-14-like enzymes. However, the [bla.sub.CTX-M-15] genotype was retrieved from wild birds. The CTX-M-15 gene shows a global distribution in clinical settings but has been reported from poultry in the United Kingdom (11) and from wild birds in Sweden (5), which indicates that this ESBL type also is widely disseminated in the environment.
The PCR-based genotyping showed the diversity of the ESBL-producing E. coli isolates. Wild birds and domestic poultry harbored the same strains, and some of the ducks had the same strains as chickens. This commonality of strains might be caused by a common use of natural water resources, and shows with what ease E. coli can travel between species.
MLST analysis identified several human-associated genotypes, including ST448, ST405, ST744, ST648, and ST131. The epidemic E. coli strain O25bST131 did not carry the more common CTX-M-15 gene but a CTX-M-14-like gene, a frequent finding in hospitals in Taiwan (12). Metallo-p-lactamases of the New Delhi metallo-p-lactamase type have not been found in the environment of Bangladesh (13), but ST405 and ST648 are associated with New Delhi metallo-p-lactamase-1-producing organisms on the subcontinent of India (14). Finally, E. coli ST744 carried in this study CTX-M-1. ESBL-producing E. coli ST744 has been reported previously in humans in Laos (15).
We showed that E. coli that produces CTX-M-15 is endemic to birds in Bangladesh. Our findings suggest that wild birds and free-range poultry might be crucial environmental indicators of antimicrobial drug resistance. They also might take a more active part than previously thought as spreaders and as long-term reservoirs of medically threatening pathogens and resistance genes. Several factors are likely to contribute to the widespread dispersal of ESBLs in Bangladesh, including dense population, poor sanitation, and close contact with livestock combined with a high selective pressure created by unrestricted use of antimicrobial drugs in human medicine, veterinary medicine, and aquaculture. Development of a countrywide antimicrobial resistance surveillance system in livestock, wildlife species, and humans in Bangladesh, as well as other measures, are needed immediately to control the situation.
We thank Abdus Salam, Ariful Islam, and Abbtesaim Jawad for their technical support. We also thank Justin Makii for his contribution as English proofreader.
This work was supported by The Swedish Institute (00559/2008), the Medical Faculty of Uppsala University, the Swedish Research Council FORMAS (2008-326), Indevelops Foundation, Karin Korsners Foundation, and Olle Engkvist Byggmastare Foundation.
Dr Hasan is a veterinarian and doctoral student at the Department ofMedical Sciences, Sections of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases at the Faculty of Medicine at Uppsala University, Sweden. His main research interests are molecular epidemiology with focus on antimicrobial drug resistance (ESBL/MBL-producing enterobacteria, vancomycin-resistant enterococcus, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus), wildlife diseases, and bacterial zoonotic diseases in developing countries.
Author affiliations: Uppsala University Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden (B. Hasan, A. Melhus, M. Drobni, B. Olsen); Linnaeus University Centre for Ecology and Epidemiology in Microbial Model Systems, Kalmar, Sweden (B. Hasan, J. Hernandez, J. Waldenstrom, B. Olsen); International Center for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh (M. Alam); and Uppsala University Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala (L. Sandegren).
(1.) Hawkey PM. Prevalence and clonality of extended spectrum P-lactamases (ESBL) in Asia. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008;14:15965. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01855.x
(2.) Pitout JD, Laupland KB. Extended-spectrum beta lactamases (ESBL) producing Enterobacteriaceae: an emerging public-health concern. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008;8:159-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473 3099(08)70041-0
(3.) Hernandez J, Bonnedahl J, Eliasson I, Wallensten A, Comstedt P, Johansson A, et al. Globally disseminated human pathogenic Escherichia coli of O25b-ST131 clone, harbouring blaCTX-M-15, found in Glaucous-winged gull at remote Commander Islands, Russia. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2010;2:329-32. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1758-2229.2010.00142.x
(4.) Blanc V, Mesa R, Saco M, Lavilla S, Prats G, Miro E, et al. ESBL and plasmidic class C p-lactamase-producing E. coli strains isolated from poultry, pig and rabbit farms. Vet Microbiol. 2006;118:299304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.08.002
(5.) Bonnedahl J, Drobni P, Johansson A, Hernandez J, Melhus A, Stedt J, et al. Characterization, and comparison, of human clinical and blackheaded gull (Larus ridibundus) extended-spectrum beta-lactamaseproducing bacterial isolates from Kalmar, on the southeast coast of Sweden. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65:193 9-44. http://dx.doi. org/10.1093/jac/dkq222
(6.) Hasan B, Faruque R, Drobn M, Waldenstrom J, Sadique A, Ahmed KU, et al. High prevalence of antibiotic resistance in pathogenic Escherichia coli from large and small scale poultry farms in Bangladesh. Avian Dis. 2011;55:689-92. http://dx.doi. org/10.1637/9686-021411-Reg.1
(7.) Rahman M, Shoma S, Rashid H, Siddique AK, Nair GB, Sack DA. Extended-spectrum p-lactamase-mediated third-generation cephalosporin resistance in Shigella isolates in Bangladesh. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004;54:846-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ jac/dkh413
(8.) Rahman MM, Haq JA, Hossain MA, Sultana R, Islam F, Islam AH. Prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in an urban hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004;24:508-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2004.05.007
(9.) Klint M, Lofdahl M, Ek C, Airell A, Berglund T, Herrmann B. Lymphogranuloma venereum prevalence in Sweden among men who have sex with men and characterization of Chlamydia trachomatis ompA genotypes. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:4066-71. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16971651
(10.) Wirth T, Falush D, Lan R, Colles F, Mensa P, Wieler LH. Sex and virulence in Escherichia coli: an evolutionary perspective. Mol Microbiol. 2006;60:1136-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958. 2006.05172.x
(11.) Randall LP, Clouting C, Horton RA, Coldham NG, Wu G, Clifton Hadley FA. Prevalence of Escherichia coli carrying extended-spectrum p-lactamases (CTX-M and TEM-52) from broiler chickens and turkeys in Great Britain between 2006 and 2009. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66:86-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkq396
(12.) Chung HC, Lai CH, Lin JN, Huang CK, Liang SH, Chen WF, et al. Bacteremia caused by extended-spectrum-p-Lactamase-producing Escherichia coli sequence type ST131 and non-ST131 clones: comparison of demographic data, clinical features, and mortality. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:618-22. http://dx.doi. org/10.1128/AAC.05753-11
(13.) Hasan B, Drobni P, Drobni M, Alam M, Olsen B. Dissemination of NDM-1. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12:99-100. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70333-4
(14.) Mushtaq S, Irfan S, Sarma JB, Doumith M, Pike R, Pitout J, et al. Phylogenetic diversity of Escherichia coli strains producing NDMtype carbapenemases. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66:2002-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkr226
(15.) Stoesser N, Crook DW, Moore CE, Phetsouvanh R, Chansamouth V, Newton PN, et al. Characteristics of CTX-M ESBL-producing Escherichia coli isolates from the Lao People's Democratic Republic, 2004-09. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67:240-2. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkr434
Address for correspondence: Badrul Hasan, Department of Medical Sciences/Section of Infectious Diseases, Uppsala University, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden; email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Table 1. Antimicrobial drug resistance phenotypes in randomly isolated Escherichia coli from wild and domestic birds, Bangladesh Domestic birds, n = 52 Drug Tetracycline 24 Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 17 Ampicillin 15 Cephradine 0 Cefuroxime 2 Cefadroxil 0 Nalidixic acid 11 Ciprofloxacin 3 Streptomycin 3 Gentamicin 0 Fosfomycin 0 Chloramphenicol 4 Nitrofurantoin 1 Tigecycline 0 Mecillinam 0 Wild birds, n = 14 Drug Tetracycline 1 Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 2 Ampicillin 4 Cephradine 1 Cefuroxime 1 Cefadroxil 1 Nalidixic acid 1 Ciprofloxacin 1 Streptomycin 1 Gentamicin 1 Fosfomycin 1 Chloramphenicol 0 Nitrofurantoin 0 Tigecycline 0 Mecillinam 0 Table 2. Antimicrobial drug resistance genotype classification of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli isolates from wild birds and free-range poultry, Bangladesh * Host Isolate Common teal B51 (Anas crecca) Common teal B53 Tufted duck B66 (Aythya fuligula) Domestic duck B93 (Anas platyrhynchos) Domestic duck B97 Domestic duck B98 Domestic duck B100 Domestic duck B102 Domestic duck B106 Domestic chicken B125 (Gallus domesticus) Domestic chicken B127 Domestic chicken B129 Domestic chicken B130w Domestic chicken B133 Domestic chicken B136P Domestic chicken B137P Domestic chicken B140 Domestic chicken B143 Host ESB type Common teal CTX-M-15 (Anas crecca) Common teal CTX-M-15 Tufted duck CTX-M-15 (Aythya fuligula) Domestic duck CTX-M-15 (Anas platyrhynchos) Domestic duck CTX-M-15 Domestic duck CTX-M-15 Domestic duck CTX-M-15 Domestic duck CTX-M-15 Domestic duck CTX-M-15 Domestic chicken CTX-M-15 (Gallus domesticus) Domestic chicken CTX-M-1 Domestic chicken CTX-M-15 Domestic chicken CTX-M-14 like Domestic chicken CTX-M-15 Domestic chicken CTX-M-15 Domestic chicken CTX-M-1 Domestic chicken CTX-M-15 Domestic chicken CTX-M-15 Repetitive element Host PCR genotype Common teal A4 (Anas crecca) Common teal A Tufted duck A3 (Aythya fuligula) Domestic duck E (Anas platyrhynchos) Domestic duck G Domestic duck F Domestic duck D Domestic duck H Domestic duck I Domestic chicken A2 (Gallus domesticus) Domestic chicken J Domestic chicken K Domestic chicken L Domestic chicken M Domestic chicken N Domestic chicken O Domestic chicken A Domestic chicken B Sequence Host type Common teal ST1408 (Anas crecca) Common teal ST1408 Tufted duck ST1312 (Aythya fuligula) Domestic duck ST2141 (Anas platyrhynchos) Domestic duck ST2690 ([dagger]) Domestic duck ST448 ([double dagger]) Domestic duck ST405 ([section]) Domestic duck ST2691 ([dagger]) Domestic duck ST648 Domestic chicken ST206 ([paragraph]) (Gallus domesticus) Domestic chicken ST744 Domestic chicken ST648 Domestic chicken ST131 Domestic chicken ST2450 Domestic chicken ST2692 ([dagger]) Domestic chicken ST744 Domestic chicken ST2693 ([dagger]) Domestic chicken ST224 * ESBL, extended-spectrum p-lactamase. ([dagger]) New sequence type. ([double dagger]) Clonal complex ST448. ([section]) Clonal complex ST405. ([paragraph]) Clonal complex ST206.
|Gale Copyright:||Copyright 2012 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.|