Anti-albuminuric efficacy of a combination of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor & angiotensin receptor blocker in type 1 DM with nephropathy.
Background & objective: The efficacy of the combination of
angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin converting enzyme
(ACE) inhibitors in patients of type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) with
nephropathy is debatable. The antialbuminuric efficacy of dual blockade
in patients of type 1 DM with micro- or macroabuminuria were evaluated.
Methods: In this open label observational study 30 patients (20 male 10 female) with type 1 DM were included who were initially treated with telmisartan 80 mg for eight weeks followed by addition of ramipril 10 mg for a further eight weeks. Albuminuria reduction was studied at the end of each phase.
Results: Therapy with telmisartan for 8 wk resulted in a 39 per cent (P<0.01) reduction in albumin excretion rate (AER). Combination therapy with telmisartan and ramipril produced a further reduction in AER of 33.4 per cent (P<0.01), amounting to a total AER reduction of 59 per cent (P<0.001). Dual blockade was more effective in the group of macroalbuminuric as compared to microalbuminuric subjects (P<0.05). Telmisartan produced a significant reduction in SBP (P<0.05). The addition of ramipril produced a further reduction in BP, the total reduction being 10.3 in SBP and 7.2 mmHg in DBP (P<0.001 for both). There was an increase in mean serum potassium of 0.39 mmol/l (P<0.01) from baseline at the end of the study period and two patients had hyperkalemia > 5.5 mmol/l with dual blockade.
Interpretation & conclusion: Dual blockade with ramipril enhanced the antialbuminuric efficacy of telmisartan and further reduced blood pressure. The effect of dual blockade was more pronounced in the macroalbuminuric subjects and it was well tolerated. However, careful monitoring of serum potassium is required.
Key words ACE inhibitors - ARBs - nephropathy - type 1 diabetes mellitus
Antihypertensive drugs (Health aspects)
Diabetic nephropathies (Research)
Type 1 diabetes (Care and treatment)
Bhadada, Sanjay K.
Kohli, Harbir S.
|Publication:||Name: Indian Journal of Medical Research Publisher: Indian Council of Medical Research Audience: Academic Format: Magazine/Journal Subject: Biological sciences; Health Copyright: COPYRIGHT 2010 Indian Council of Medical Research ISSN: 0971-5916|
|Issue:||Date: July, 2010 Source Volume: 132 Source Issue: 1|
|Topic:||Event Code: 310 Science & research|
|Product:||Product Code: 2834340 Blood Pressure Preparations NAICS Code: 325412 Pharmaceutical Preparation Manufacturing SIC Code: 2833 Medicinals and botanicals; 2834 Pharmaceutical preparations|
|Geographic:||Geographic Scope: India Geographic Code: 9INDI India|
Type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) is the most frequent cause of chronic
disease in young people. Nephropathy has maximum impact on survival
accounting for almost all the mortality in the first twenty years of the
disease (1). Interestingly, only half the patients develop diabetic
renal disease and predisposing factors include both systemic and
intraglomerular hypertension, hyperglycaemia and genetic predisposition
Current recommendations by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) support the use of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in type 1 diabetes with micro- or macroalbuminuria, and consider angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) an alternative, if ACE inhibitors are not tolerated. This is in contrast to type 2 diabetes with microalbuminuria where ARBs and ACE inhibitors are considered equivalent, and in type 2 diabetes with proteinuria and or renal insufficiency, ARBs are the drug of choice (3). Several studies are available regarding the use of ARBs in type 2 diabetes (4-6). However, literature is scanty in type 1 DM pertaining to the use of ARBs. Only few studies, all from a single center, are available on the efficacy of ARBs use in type 1 DM with microalbuminuria (7,8).
ACE inhibitors and ARBs interrupt the renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) at different levels, and the combination of these classes of drugs may have an additive effect on albumin excretion and renoprotection. A recent meta-analysis of studies in diabetic nephropathy concluded that dual blockade was more efficacious for reduction of albuminuria in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, but the meta-analysis included only three studies in type 1 DM patients (9). However, dual blockade has come into disrepute after the recent Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET) trial (10) which has shown that dual blockade is more efficacious in BP reduction compared to single agent, but dual blockade was associated with more renal dysfunction with some requiring haemodialysis. Therefore, we planned to evaluate the efficacy of dual blockade with both ACE inhibitors and ARB at optimal doses in patients with type 1 DM and nephropathy.
Material & Methods
Screening and recruitment: The present open label observational study (CTR no. NCT00738660) was performed in 58 consecutive patients with type 1 DM with nephropathy attending the Endocrinology Clinic of Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER) Chandigarh, between January 2007 and January 2008, of which 30 completed the study (Fig. 1). Ethical approval for the study protocol was obtained from the institutional review board. The inclusion criteria were: age >14 yr; type 1 diabetes (DM diagnosed by ADA criteria with history of diabetic ketoacidosis), HbA1c <7.5 per cent and albuminuria defined by albumin excretion rate (AER) >20 [micro]g/min in two timed overnight urine samples. The exclusion criteria were: patients with serum creatinine of more than 3 mg/dl at baseline, hyperkalemia >5.5 mmol/l, active urinary sediment or urinary tract infection (UTI), uncontrolled hypertension or congestive cardiac failure, supected or proven non-diabetic renal disease. Details of the study population are enumerated in the Table. There was an initial six week run-in period during which treatment was optimized as per protocol (Fig 1).
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
Clinical protocol: All patients recruited into the study underwent a detailed physical examination including for other diabetic complications. At baseline and at each visit, blood pressure was measured with an appropriate sized cuff in right arm with the patient seated and after 15 min of rest. Three readings were taken 5 min apart and the mean of these readings was taken as the clinic BP.
The study consisted of two phases. In the first phase, telmisartan was started at a dose of 40 mg per day and after 2 wk up-titrated to 80 mg per day to be taken between 0800-1000 h which was continued for 6 more weeks, and at the end of 8 wk urinary albumin was done. Immediately following the completion of the first phase assessments, ramipril was added at a dose of 5 mg per day and after 2 wk up-titrated to 10 mg per day to be taken between 1200-1400 h and was continued for 6 more weeks. At the end of the second phase at 16 weeks urine albumin was measured again.
At each office visit patients were enquired regarding specific side effect of drugs. Patients were withdrawn from study if they developed any severe adverse events including estimated GFR decreased by [greater than or equal to] 50 per cent and/or serum potassium >5.5 mmol/l. (Fig. 2).
Statistical analysis: Sample size calculated by Epi Info version 8 was 30 to achieve a power of 80 per cent for detecting a difference of 30 per cent in AER with an a of 0.05. Statistical analysis was carried out using statistical program for the Social Sciences (Release 10.01, PC Windows; SPSS Inc., Chicago IL). Comparison of variables for significance was done by Wilcoxon's signed rank test (for data with skewed distribution) and paired samples "t test" (for data approximating normal distributions). Normality of distribution was assessed using skewness. Univariate correlations were done by the Spearman's method. Comparison between groups was done with the Mann-Whitney U test.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
Baseline characteristics of study population: Thirty patients (10 females) completed the study. The mean age of patients was 26.1 [+ or -] 9.69 yr and mean duration of diabetes was 12.4 [+ or -] 8.1 yr. The mean body mass index was 19.73 [+ or -] 2.28 kg/[m.sup.2] and the HbA1c at baseline was 6.4 [+ or -] 0.6 per cent. The mean SBP and DBP were 123.6 [+ or -] 9.2 and 75.9 [+ or -] 7.4 mmHg, respectively (Table). Twenty patients were hypertensive by the ADA criteria. Ten patients had macroalbuminuria and 20 had microalbuminuria. Two patients had eGFR less than 60 ml/min at baseline. Twenty three of these patients had never received ACE inhibitors/ ARBs prior to the study. Eighteen (60%) patients had neuropathy, 16 (53.3%) had retinopathy which was seen more in macroalbuminurics. None had macrovascular complications.
Effect on urine albumin excretion: AER declined by 39 per cent at 8 wk (from baseline value of441.37 [+ or -] 137.83 to 269.85 [+ or -] 44.9 [micro]g/min; P<0.01) with telmisartan. Dual blockade with ramipril and telmisartan produced a further reduction in AER of 33.4 per cent (from 269.85 [+ or -] 44.9 at 8 wk to 167.59 [+ or -] 44.9 [micro]g/min at 16 wk; P<0.01), with a total AER reduction of 59 per cent from baseline value (P<0.001) at the end of the study. For the macroalbuminuric subjects the degree of reduction in AER was 39.8 per cent (from baseline value of 1168.28 [+ or -] 308.54 to 702.65 [+ or -] 183.65 mg/min; P<0.05) with telmisartan, further reduction with dual blockade was 40.3 per cent (from 702.65 [+ or -] 183.65 at 8 wk to 419.27 [+ or -] 92.52 [micro]g/min at 16 wk; P<0.05) and a total reduction of 64.1 per cent (P<0.01). For the microalbuminuric subjects the degree of reduction in AER was 31 per cent (from baseline value of 77.92 [+ or -] 10.39 to 53.54 [+ or -] 12.49 [micro]g/min; P<0.05) with telmisartan, further reduction with dual blockade was 22 per cent (from 53.54 [+ or -] 12.49 at 8 wk to 41.75 [+ or -] 11.87 [micro]g/min at 16 wk; P=0.19) and a total reduction of 46.2 per cent (P<0.05). Dual blockade was more effective in the group of macroalbuminuric as compared to microalbuminuric subjects (64.1 vs 46.2% reduction; P<0.05 (Fig. 3).
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
There was a significant reduction in SBP by 10.3 mm Hg (P<0.001) which was accounted by 4 mmHg fall with telmisartan (P<0.05) and further 6.3 mmHg reduction by ramipril (P<0.001). DBP also showed a significant reduction of 7.2 mmHg from baseline (P<0.01) in which dual blockade resulted in a fall of 5.9 mm Hg (P<0.001), while telmisartan alone led to non significant fall of 1.3 mm Hg. All the patients tolerated therapy well except two hypertensive patients who complained of postural giddiness at the initiation of therapy and later tolerated well. No episode of hypotension was recorded.
Therapy with telmisartan produced a significant fall in estimated GFR of 13 ml/min (10.5%; P<0.05) after initial 8 wk. Over the next 8 wk despite addition of ramipril, GFR remained stable with a net decrease of 8 ml/min (6.9%) at the end of the study. The mean creatinine rose significantly by 7.4 per cent (P<0.01) from 0.82 mg/dl at baseline to 0.88 mg/dl at the end of 16 weeks. Potassium rose significantly with dual blockade (8.7%, P<0.01), whereas it was non significant with telmisartan alone (2.7%). Two patients had a serum potassium >5.5 mmol/l towards the end of the study and were managed with potassium binding resin.
In univariate analysis the reduction in albuminuria with telmisartan correlated with reduction in clinic SBP but not DBP at the end of first phase (r= 0.664, P=0.013). However, no significant correlation either with systolic or with diastolic blood pressure was obtained with dual blockade at the end of the study.
Our results showed significant reduction in urinary albumin excretion with dual blockade in optimal doses in patients with type1 DM, however, the effect was more pronounced in macroalbuminuric subjects as compared to microalbuminuric subjects. It was accompanied by a significant reduction in both systolic as well as diastolic BP and correlated with reduction in SBP Dual blockade therapy was well tolerated by majority of patients. Our results partly may also be attributed to good glycaemic control and concurrent statin therapy, which was lacking in previous studies (7,8,15-17).
Angiotensin II and aldosterone are generated through multiple pathways and non ACE pathways contribute to 70 per cent of angiotensin II production. Hence, ACE inhibitors do not block RAAS completely (9). ACE inhibitors but not ARBs prolong the half-life of bradykinin, a potent renoprotective vasodilator (9) which may also contribute to additional reduction in intraglomerular hypertension. However, on prolonged treatment with ACE inhibitors alone ACE escape is seen resulting in increased levels of angiotensin II leading to decreased antialbuminuric and antihypertensive efficacy (18,19). In a dual blockade strategy effects of ACE inhibitors and ARBs complement each other and ACE escape can be overcome.
There are limited data for dual blockade in type 1 DM with nephropathy (9,15-17) which show that dual blockade in optimal doses results in an additional 36-46 per cent reduction in albuminuria above that seen with monotherapy with either agent alone. Dual blockade was also found to be more effective in patients with a higher albuminuria at baseline (15,16). Our study also supported both these findings.
The daily doses of telmisartan and ramipril used in our study were optimal (10,20). Literature suggests that dual blockade with submaximal doses of medications may be as effective as full doses with fewer side effects (21), however recent studies have demonstrated that use of higher doses of these agents was superior to lower doses for reducing proteinuria (11,22). Our study which used optimal doses of both medications showed a good short term antialbuminuric efficacy similar to previous studies (7,17,19). However, long term studies are needed to conirm the concern that advantage of dual blockade disappears with their prolonged use (21).
ACE inhibitors and ARBs have modest antihypertensive efficacy in diabetes and lead to mean reduction of 5.2 (2.1-8.4) mmHg in SBP and 5.3 (2.2-8.4) mmHg in DBP (9). Our study showed reduction of 10.3 and 7.2 mmHg in systolic and diastolic blood pressure respectively, probably due to the younger age of our patients and shorter duration as the effects of treatment tend to wane with time.
Patients in our study tolerated the therapy well in contrast to the ONTARGET study (10). This may be because the patients in our study were younger (26.1 yr) than in the ONTARGET study (66.4 yr) and had lesser co-morbidities. Despite being normotensive, our patients exhibited a good antialbuminuric response with dual blockade, which may be useful in long run in populations like ours.
Our study showed that reduction in albuminuria correlated significantly with a fall in SBP with telmisartan monotherapy similar to a study (23) showing positive correlation between fall in BP and reduction in urine albumin excretion. This finding differs from some previous studies which showed reduction in albumin excretion to be independent of fall in BP (7).
The net GFR reduction was 6.5 per cent in our study with a sharp fall during the first 8 wk followed by stabilization, this pattern of change in GFR has been well documented in previous studies (6). Dual blockade with ramipril and telmisartan was associated with a significant increase in potassium, similar to previous studies where dual blockade was used (4,7,17).
In conclusion, dual blockade with telmisartan and ramipril is particularly effective in patients with macroalbuminuria and had an additive effect on BP reduction. Dual blockade is safe and well tolerated, however, regular monitoring of serum potassium is required. Long term studies are required to substantiate these observations.
(1.) Marshall SM. Clinical features and management of diabetic nephropathy. In: Pickup JC, Williams G, editors. Textbook of diabetes, 3rd ed. Blackwell Publishing; 2003. p. 53.1-22.
(2.) Parving HH, Mauer M, Ritz E. Diabetic nephropathy. In: Brenner M, editor. The kidney, 6th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2000. p. 1777-818.
(3.) American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes -2008. Diabetes Care 2008; 31 (Suppl) : S12-54.
(4.) Mogensen CE, Neldam S, Tikkanen I, Oren S, Viskoper R, Watts RW, et al. Randomised controlled trial of dual blockade of renin-angiotensin system in patients with hypertension, microalbu-minuria, and non-insulin dependent diabetes: the candesartan and lisinopril microalbuminuria (CALM) study. BMJ 2000; 321 : 1440-4.
(5.) Lacourciere Y, Belanger A, Godin C, Halle JP, Ross S, Wright N, et al. Long-term comparison of losartan and enalapril on kidney function in hypertensive type 2 diabetics with early nephropathy. Kidney Int 2000; 58 : 762-9.
(6.) Barnett AH, Bain SC, Bouter P, Karlberg B, Madsbad S, Jervell J, et al. Diabeties exposed to Telmisartan and Enalapril Study Group. Angiotensin-receptor blockade versus converting-enzymes inhibition in type 2 diabetes and naphropathy. N Engl J Med 2004 ; 351 : 1952-61.
(7.) Andersen S, Tarnow L, Rossing P, Hansen BV, Parving HH. Renoprotective effects of angiotensin II receptor blockade in type 1 diabetic patients with Diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int 2000 ; 57 : 601-6.
(8.) Andersen S, Tarnow L, Cambien F, Rossing P, Juhl TR, Deinum J, et al. Long-term renoprotective effects of losartan in diabetic nephropathy interaction with ACE insertion/ deletion genotype? Diabetes Care 2003; 26 : 1501-56 .
(9.) Jennings DL, Kalus JS, Coleman, CI. Manierski C, Yee J. Combination therapy with an ACE inhibitor and an angiotensin receptor blocker for diabetic nephropathy: a meta-analysis. DiabetMed 2007; 24 : 486-93.
(10.) The ONTARGET Investigators. Yusuf S, Teo KK, Pogue J, Dyal L, Copland I, Schumacher H, editors. Telmisartan, Ramipril, or both in patients at high risk for vascular events. N Engl J Med 2008; 358 : 1547-59.
(11.) Toto RD. Microalbuminuria : definition, detection and clinical significance. J. Clin Hyperten 2001; 6 (Suppl 3) : 2-7.
(12.) Masson P, Ohlsson P, Bjorkhem I. Combined enzymatic-Jaffe method for detection of creatinine serum. Clin Chem 1981; 27 : 18-21.
(13.) Postmes TJS, Halders S, Herpers H, Sels JP, Coenegracht JM. Colorimetry vs column chromatography in HbA1 assay. Clin Chem 1981; 27 : 635-6.
(14.) Potter H, Mantasas F. Are eGFR equations better than IDMS-trace the serum creatinine in classifying chronic kidney disease? Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2009; 69 : 550-61.
(15.) Jacobsen P, Andersen S, Rossing K, Hansen BV, Parving HH. Dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system in type 1 patients with diabetic nephropathy. Nephrol Dialysis Transplant 2002; 17 : 1019-24.
(16.) Jacobsen P, Andersen S, Jensen BR and Parving HH. Additive effect of ACE inhibition and angiotensin II receptor blockade in type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14 : 992-9.
(17.) Jacobsen P, Andersen S, Rossing K, Jensen BR, Parving HH. Dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system versus maximal recommended dose of ACE inhibition in diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int 2003; 63 : 1874-80.
(18.) van den Meiracker AH, Man in 't Veld AJ, Admiraal PJ, Ritsema van Eck HJ, Boomsma F, Derkx FH, et al. Partial escape of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition during prolonged ACE inhibitor treatment: does it exist and does it affect the antihypertensive response? J Hypertens 1992; 10 : 803-12.
(19.) Nussberger J, Brunner DB, Waeber B, Brunner HR. Plasma angiotensins under sustained converting enzyme inhibition with enalapril in normal humans. J Hypertens1985; 3 (Suppl.) : S269-70.
(20.) Rippin J, Bain SC, Barnett AH, DETAIZ study. Rationale and design of diabetics exposed to telmisartan and enalapril (DETAIL) study. J Diabetes Complications 2002; 16 : 195-200.
(21.) Tutuncu NB, Gurlek A, Gedik O. Efficacy of ACE inhibitors and ATII receptor blockers in patients with microalbuminuria: a prospective study. Acta Diabetol 2001; 38 : 157-61.
(22.) Laverman GD, Navis G, Henning RH, de Jong PE, de Zeeuw D. Dual renin-angiotensin system blockade at optimal doses for proteinuria. Kidney Int 2002; 62 : 1020-5.
(23.) Poirier L, Champlain de J, Larochelle P, Cliche ML, Lacourcie'rey. A comparison of the efficacy and duration of action of telmisartan, amlodipine and ramipril in patients with conirmed ambulatory hypertension. Blood Press Monit 2004; 9 : 231-6.
Anantharaman R., Anil Bhansali, Sanjay K. Bhadada, Harbir S. Kohli *, Pinaki Dutta, Rama Walia, Jayaprakash P. & Vimal Upreti
Departments of Endocrinology & 'Nephrology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research Chandigarh, India
Received April 6, 2009
Reprint requests: Dr Anil Bhansali, Professor and Head, Department of Endocrinology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh,160 012, India e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Table. Clinical and biochemical profile of study population Baseline 8th week (n=30) Telmisartan (n=30) Clinic SBP 123.63 [+ or -] 9.2 119.63 [+ or -] 10.83 (mmHg) Clinic DBP 75.87 [+ or -] 7.39 74.5 [+ or -] 8.15 (mmHg) HbA1c (%) 6.42 [+ or -] 0.57 -- Creatinine 0.82 [+ or -] 0.36 0.884 [+ or -] 0.33 (mg/dl) GFR 123.67 [+ or -] 41.41 110.62 [+ or -] 38.64 (ml/min) Potassium 4.38 [+ or -] 0.45 4.5 [+ or -] 0.508 (mmol/l) LDL 103.83 [+ or -] 31.54 87.15 [+ or -] 32.31 cholesterol (mg/dl) 16th week Dual blockade (n=30) Clinic SBP 113.3 [+ or -] 9.41 *** (mmHg) Clinic DBP 68.57 [+ or -] 6.79 *** (mmHg) HbA1c (%) 6.03 [+ or -] 0.67 * Creatinine 0.881 [+ or -] 0.79 ** (mg/dl) GFR 115.12 [+ or -] 41.48 (ml/min) Potassium 4.77 [+ or -] 0.591 ** (mmol/l) LDL 83.46 [+ or -] 29.01 ** cholesterol (mg/dl) Values represented as mean (SD) SBP, systolic blood pressure, DBP, diastolic blood pressure, GFR, glomerular litration rate P * < 0.05, ** < 0.01, *** < 0.001 compared to baseline
|Gale Copyright:||Copyright 2010 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.|